Technological Difference – Snippets Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:51:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Technological Difference – Snippets 32 32 Cipla manufacturing plant reopens after looting incident Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:51:44 +0000

As South Africa grapples with the aftermath of recent civil unrest and violent looting, Cipla’s manufacturing plant in Durban – which was sadly hit during the turmoil – stands ready to reopen and resume operations .

Some media have falsely claimed that the facility burned down, when it was in fact vandalized on July 13, 2021. Fortunately, none of the more than 500 Cipla employees working at the plant were injured in the incident. .

After the looting incident, Cipla put in place adequate emergency measures, such as operating its global supply chain and other manufacturing sites, to ensure the continuity of the supply of medicines, especially for key therapeutic areas such as antiretrovirals for people living with HIV. From an inventory perspective, Cipla also had a good amount of buffer stock in its other distribution centers across the country, which helped mitigate any possible supply disruptions.

Cipla South Africa CEO Paul Miller (right) at the Durban facility, which is back up and running

Cipla South Africa CEO Paul Miller said: “The staff at Cipla have shown an indomitable spirit and have worked tirelessly to ensure that we can resume operations as quickly as possible at this facility. We were also fortunate to have the support of various other actors in the local community who helped in the aftermath of this incident.

“Whatever the circumstances, we are committed to our ‘Take Care of Life’ philosophy, and the rapid turnaround time to get this site back up and running is proof of that,” Miller said. Cipla employed five subcontractors to expedite the intensive cleaning operation and repair process at this Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) certified facility.

Localized industry is one of the most effective stimulators of economic growth and job creation. Therefore, as a proudly South African pharmaceutical manufacturing company, Cipla is focused on an “Africa for Africa” strategy. Cipla’s footprint spans the entire African continent: in addition to the Durban factory, Cipla also has a factory in Johannesburg and another manufacturing facility in Uganda. It aims to equip various regions with its own manufacturing capacities and invests in upgrading the technological capabilities of these factories to improve production capacity, stimulate digital innovation and ensure patients have uninterrupted access to quality medicines and affordable.

By actively creating employment and skills development opportunities, the result is more than just economic growth; it is to offer better health to patients and to ensure the socio-economic well-being of communities.

Manufacturing industry in particular stimulates more economic activity in society than any other sector. This globally recognized multiplier effect creates employment opportunities, demand for resources, investment and development opportunities. This invaluable stimulating effect on economic growth is attributed to the many important links between manufacturing and most other sectors of the economy.

Therefore, in addition to ensuring the continuity of drug supply, it was also essential that Cipla resume operations as quickly as possible at the affected manufacturing facility.

About Cipla:

Founded in 1935, Cipla is a global pharmaceutical company focused on agile and sustainable growth, complex generics and a deepening portfolio in our home markets of India, South Africa, North America and the United States. main regulated and emerging markets. Our strengths in the respiratory, antiretroviral, urological, cardiological, anti-infective and CNS segments are well known.

Our 46 manufacturing sites around the world produce more than 50 dosage forms and more than 1,500 products using advanced technology platforms to serve our more than 80 markets. Cipla is ranked third in pharmaceuticals in India, third in private pharmaceutical market in South Africa, and among the most widely distributed generic players in the United States.

For more than eight decades, making a difference for patients has inspired all aspects of Cipla’s work. Our paradigm shift offering of triple HIV antiretroviral therapy for less than a dollar a day in Africa in 2001 is widely recognized as having helped put inclusiveness, accessibility and affordability at the center of the movement. HIV.

As a responsible corporate citizen, Cipla’s humanitarian approach to healthcare in pursuit of its goal of “Caring for Life” and deep-rooted community ties wherever it operates make it a partner of choice for global health organizations, peers and all stakeholders.

For more, please visit Cipla, or click Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn.

About Cipla South Africa:

Cipla Medpro South Africa (Pty) Limited (Cipla Medpro) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cipla Limited, India (Cipla) and the third largest private sector pharmaceutical company in South Africa. Through Cipla’s philosophy of “Caring for Life”, Cipla Medpro produces world-class medicines at affordable prices for the public and private sectors, thus advancing health care for all South Africans.

For more information visit

Source link

]]> 0
Actions discussed: (OTCPINK: $ GTCH) (NYSE: $ IBM) Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:54:12 +0000

Point Roberts, WA and Vancouver, BC – August 23, 2021 ( Newswire) (, a global source of investor news covering artificial intelligence (AI) brings you the today’s edition of The AI ​​Eye – monitoring stock market news, trade tracking and advancements in artificial intelligence – featuring tech company GBT Technologies Inc. (OTCPINK: GTCH).

Listen to today’s podcast:

AI Eye Podcast 594: Actions Discussed: (OTCPINK: $ GTCH) (NYSE: $ IBM)


Listen to the AI ​​Eye on Spotify

Chronicle of the dayThe AI ​​Eye – Watch stock market news, trade tracking and artificial intelligence advancements

AI Eye Episode 594: GBT Tests NVIS Antenna Technology For Long Range Communication Infinia And IBM Unveils Telum Processor With On-Chip AI Acceleration

Actions discussed: (OTCPINK: GTCH) (NYSE: IBM)

GBT Technologies Inc. (OTC PINK: GTC) announced that it is now testing Near Vertical Incidence Skywave (NVIS) antenna technology for its Infinia long range communication. NVIS is described in the press release as “a type of ionospheric radio transmission that can be used to bridge gaps between line of sight and longer range hopping areas that are used on HF bands.” Company technical director Danny Rittman explained:

“This type of technology requires the use of unique antennas designed specifically for this type of communication. Typical HF radio antennas provide a much lower beam angle and therefore a specially designed antenna will be used.

These antennas provide a high transmission angle which is necessary for NVIS propagation. We will use horizontal dipoles and horizontally polarized loop antennas for system testing. The main challenge of an HF communication system is to cover dead zones. NVIS uses the difference in the responses of the elevation model approaching or reaching 90 degrees. Using this type of antenna technology with an appropriate frequency selection will potentially establish reliable communication to cover HF dead zones. Using AI algorithms, we aim to implement smart and auto-tuning antennas as well as frequency selection to achieve optimum auto performance and full coverage. In areas where there is no modern communication infrastructure, NVIS radio wave propagation can provide contact with the outside world enabling remote emergency response, telemedicine and communication in the modern world, including the Internet. .

IBM (NYSE: IBM) To unveiled details of the upcoming Telum processor, which aims to bring deep learning inference to enterprise workloads, helping fight real-time fraud, and which will contain on-chip acceleration for AI inference while a transaction is in progress. An excerpt from the press release reads as follows:

The new chip features an innovative centralized design, which enables customers to harness the full power of the AI ​​processor for specific AI workloads, making it ideal for financial services workloads such as fraud detection, loan processing, clearing and settlement of transactions, the fight against money laundering and risk analysis. With these new innovations, customers will be able to improve fraud detection based on existing rules or use machine learning, speed up credit approval processes, improve customer service and profitability, identify transactions or transactions that are likely to fail and propose solutions to create a more efficient settlement. to treat.

Global AI in Food and Beverage Market to Reach $ 29.45 Billion by End of 2026

A report published by Facts and Factors finds that the global AI in food and beverage market will grow from $ 3.07 billion in 2020 to $ 29.45 billion by the end of 2026, registering a compound annual growth rate (CAGR ) by approximately 45.7% over the forecast period 2021-2026. An excerpt from the report summary describes the factors driving the market growth:

Artificial intelligence (AI) in the food and beverage market is expected to be driven by the growing need to analyze consumer purchasing behavior and forecast inventory levels to reduce food waste. The growing need for AI implementation to improve supply chain processes is expected to drive AI in the food and beverage market during the forecast period. In addition, the increase in research and development activities, as well as the modernization and technological advancements of devices used to monitor artificial intelligence in the food industry, will create new opportunities for artificial intelligence in the market. food and drink during the forecast period.

Sam Mowers,

Read and listen to other editions of the AI ​​Eye

For a list of artificial intelligence stocks on, visit here or become a member of Investor Ideas

Investors can trade these stocks and other ideas on our site using our list of the best stock trading apps including Robinhood, Acorn, Stash and others.

About – News that inspires great investing ideas publishes breaking news on stocks, third-party stock research, guest articles, original articles and podcasts in major stock market sectors. Find out how to invest in stocks and get insights from investors in cannabis, crypto, AI & IoT, mining, sports biotechnology, water, renewable energies, games and more. Investor Idea’s original branded content includes podcasts and columns: Crypto Corner, Play by Play sports and stock market news, Investor Ideas Potcasts Cannabis News and Stocks on the Move podcast, Cleantech and Climate Change, Exploring Mining, Betting on Gaming Podcast Stocks and AI Eye Podcast. podcasts are also available on iTunes (Apple Podcasts), Audible, Spotify, Tunein, Stitcher,, iHeartRadio, Google Podcasts and most available audio platforms.

Visit the Podcast page on

Disclaimer / Disclosure: is a digital publisher of third party equity news, articles and research and creates original content including videos, interviews and articles. Original content created by Investorideas is protected by copyright laws other than syndication rights. Our site does not make any recommendations to buy or sell any stock, service or product. Nothing on our sites should be construed as an offer or a solicitation to buy or sell any products or securities. Any investment involves risks and possible losses. This site is currently paid for news publishing and distribution, social media and marketing, content creation and more. Disclosure is issued for every paid press release, content posted / created as necessary, but otherwise the news has not been paid and has been published for the sole benefit of our readers and subscribers. Contact the management and IR of each company directly for specific questions. More information on the disclaimer: Learn more about posting your press release and our other news feed services press / and Global investors must comply with the regulations of each country. Please read the privacy policy:

Eye of AI – Watching stock market news, trade tracking and advancements in artificial intelligence is an original content brand of

Disclosure: GTCH is a paid AI action on investor ideas

Follow us on twitter

Follow us on facebook

Follow us on youtube

Download our mobile app for iPhone and Android


800 665 0411

Buy a tech guest article on

Source link

]]> 0
Can nuclear engineering be put back in the bottle? Must he? Sun, 22 Aug 2021 22:14:01 +0000

David P. Barash is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Washington; his most recent book is Threats: bullying and its discontent (2020, Oxford University Press). Ward Wilson is Executive Director of RealistRevolt and author of Five myths about nuclear weapons (2012, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt).

“You can’t put genie back in the bottle.” Those of us keen to get rid of nuclear weapons often hear this and at first glance it seems true; common sense suggests that neither geniuses nor nuclear weapons are easily bottled up. But this “common sense” is singularly false. Technologies have appeared throughout human history and just as the vast majority of plant and animal species have finally disappeared, so have the vast majority of technological geniuses. They were only rarely detained or forcibly erased; almost always, they were simply abandoned once people recognized that they were ineffective, dangerous, outdated, or sometimes just plain stupid.

So don’t be fooled by the over-repeated assertion by “defense intellectuals” that we cannot put nuclear engineering back in its bottle. We don’t have to. A lot of lousy technologies have simply been abandoned. The first big wheel bikes, called penny-farthings in England because their huge front wheel and tiny rear wheel looked like a penny next to a farthing, were very popular in the 1870s and 1880s. They were not only tough. to climb, but dangerous to fall. No one has had to uninvent them.

Between 1897 and 1927, the Stanley Motor Carriage Company sold over ten thousand Stanley Steamers, automobiles powered by steam engines. The two technologies are now funny curiosities, reserved for museums. Maybe the “transport intellectuals” warned at the time that you couldn’t put the Stanley Steamer or the penny farthing geniuses back in their bottles.

Technological determinism – the idea that an objective technological reality decides what technologies exist – seems compelling. After all, we can’t uninvent something that applies to nuclear weapons just as much as it does to penny-farthings and Stanley Steamers. But to say that nuclear weapons will always be with us because they cannot be uninvented is like saying that I will always be alive because I cannot be born.

Pessimists attached to the myth of disinvention argue that nuclear weapons can never be done away with because as long as knowledge of how to build them exists, things themselves will always exist. Inventing something is conceived as a one-way process in which the crucial step is the moment of invention. Once this line is crossed, there is no turning back.

Again, this is superficially plausible. After all, it almost always happens that once knowledge is created or ideas are promulgated, they rarely disappear. But there is a crucial difference between knowledge and ideas on the one hand, and technology on the other. Human beings do not conserve technology (except sometimes in museums) as they conserve knowledge in libraries, textbooks and cultural traditions.

Bad ideas can linger in libraries, but they won’t continue in the real world. Physicist Edward Teller, “father of the hydrogen bomb,” had bad ideas. He demanded, for example, that H-bombs be used to melt arctic ice in order to dig seaports and also to free the Northwest Passage, while other physicists, including Freeman Dyson, have spent years on Project Orion, hoping to design a rocket that would be powered by a successive series of nuclear explosions. Crap ideas should not be forgotten and given up.

Useless, dangerous or outdated technology does not need to be forced to disappear. Once something is no longer useful, it is rightly and unceremoniously ignored.

To understand how nuclear weapons could fit into this mold and be eliminated, let’s look for a moment at technologies more generally, and how they disappear. Venture capitalists, for example, realize that new technologies do not become permanent the moment they are invented, nor do they disappear because they have been uninvented. Technologies have a life cycle whose two ends are not birth and death, but adoption and abandonment.

A new device can be quite awesome, but if it isn’t widely used it won’t persist; certainly, it will not live forever just because it was invented. Technologies disappear when enough people decide to abandon them. This also applies to weapons. Stone axes did not disappear because people could no longer make them or because our ancestors ran out of stone. Iron has replaced bronze, steel has replaced iron; spears, blowguns, bows and arrows, matchlocks, blunderbusses, the gatling machine gun: each has died out because it was simply abandoned, and for good reasons.

Consider hand mortar. Developed in the 1600s, these rifles (much like a sawn-off, wide-barreled shotgun) were meant to fire an explosive grenade at an opponent. Back then, however, the triggers that could ignite on impact hadn’t been developed yet, so hand mortar relied on a somewhat complicated process: you prime the gun, put it down, grab it. grenade (carefully), light its fuse, stuff into the muzzle of the pistol and pushed it all the way down the barrel, picked up the pistol, aimed and fired.

In theory, hand mortars should have been effective weapons. But there were a lot of things that could go wrong, and that’s what happened. The fuse could hit the grenade and detonate it in the barrel. Or the fuse could double on itself when driven into the barrel, shortening the burn time, causing it to explode in the barrel again. The gun could misfire, leaving the grenade in the barrel, where it would eventually explode. (Neither event was healthy for the firing soldier.) The shock of the shot could separate the fuse from the grenade, rendering it no more lethal than a thrown stone. If you misjudged the amount of powder needed to fire the grenade from the pistol incorrectly, it could either drop the grenade at your feet or a few feet away among your own troops, or send it far above the sea. head. of your opponents.

In practice, there was too much that could go dangerously wrong with hand mortars, so that ultimately killing a group of enemy soldiers if all went well was not worth the many risks involved. Even if hand mortars had been invented, and even if any madman who wanted to could have armed his forces with them, they had negligible impact on combat. They have never been banned or uninvented. Being a technology that is both dangerous and of little use, they have simply been abandoned.

What about nuclear weapons? They are certainly dangerous, since deterrence cannot persist indefinitely without failing one day. Bertrand Russell noted that one can imagine watching a tightrope walker swinging in the air for five minutes, or even fifteen, but for an entire year? Or a hundred years? At the same time, nuclear weapons have never been very useful, if at all, except for the benefit of the few individuals, civilians and military alike, whose careers have benefited from their design, development and deployment.

So why is it not possible to imagine that they will be abandoned – just like other dangerous and essentially unnecessary technologies? They could easily disappear even if the memory of their making persists.

So yes, nuclear weapons cannot be uninvented. But the way to eliminate the danger is not to imagine that they are imbued with magical powers; it’s more about understanding that they were never a great technology to start with. Or, to the extent that they are bad geniuses, to recognize that it is not necessary to put them back in their bottles. They can be dropped on their own weight or they can just rot.

Source link

]]> 0
Research and technological innovations to be strengthened Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:52:02 +0000

Aptamers market

The latest research report published by Fact.MR on the Survey of Aptamers Market is intended to offer reliable data on various key factors shaping the growth curve and outlook for the Aptamers market. This report functions as a rich source of information for key entities such as policy makers, end-use industries, investors and opinion leaders.

Demand analysis of Aptamers Market offers a complete analysis of the various features, demand, product developments, revenue generation, and sales of the Aptamers market across the globe.

Click here for a sample report (including full table of contents, table and figures): –

A complete estimate of the Aptamers market has been provided through an optimistic scenario as well as a conservative scenario, taking into account the sales of Aptamers during the forecast period. The comparison of prices by region with the world average price is also taken into account in the study.

Analysts have used many leading industry-wide business intelligence tools to consolidate market facts, figures and data into revenue estimates and projections in Market Insights of Aptamers.

Major market stakeholders including industry players, policy makers and investors from various countries have continuously realigned their strategies and approaches to implement them in order to take advantage of new opportunities.
The Aptamers market research study offers a comprehensive analysis of various features including the analysis of Aptamers production capacity, demand, product developments, revenue generation, and the Aptamers market size across the world.

Highlights of the Aptamers report:
• Elaborate scenario of the parent market
• Transformations in the dynamics of the Aptamers market
• Detailed segmentation of the target market
• Historical, current and forecast Aptamers market size based on value and volume
• Latest industry developments and market trends for Aptamers
• competitive analysis of the Aptamers market
• Strategies adopted by Aptamers market players and product developments carried out
• Potential and niche segments, as well as their regional analysis
• Impartial analysis of the Aptamers market size
• Up-to-date and essential intelligence for market players to improve and maintain their competitiveness

Connect to an expert: –

4 Global Aptamers Market Forecast Highlights

Peptides segment reflects higher growth rate compared to other segments by product type. The Peptide segment is expected to grow at a very high rate to reflect a CAGR of 30.1% during the forecast period. The DNA segment is growing at a relatively slow pace, but enjoys a higher market share in terms of revenue in 2017. The XNA and RNA segments show similar growth rates.

The North America region is considered to be the most lucrative region for the aptamer market. The high degree of technological development and the high investments in research and development favor the aptamer market. This region has a higher market attractiveness index and is developing at a higher speed to register a CAGR of 26.3% during the forecast period. North America is the most lucrative region for aptamer market growth

The diagnostics by application segment has a higher market share in terms of revenue, followed by the therapeutic segment. But the research and development segment by application shows a higher growth rate, somewhat higher than the diagnostics segment, and is expected to post a CAGR of 26.5% during the forecast period. Diagnostics Segment Expected to Achieve High BPS by End of 2022

By end user, the academic and research center segment shows a very high growth rate and is expected to register a CAGR of 26.4% during the forecast period of 2017 to 2022 and reach the highest BPS by the end of 2022.

The pharmaceutical companies segment and the contract research organizations (CROs) segment exhibit similar growth patterns and are therefore expected to grow side by side throughout the forecast period. The biopharmaceutical companies segment enjoys higher market share in terms of revenue and dominates the market by end user type and is also expected to gain BPS by the end of 2022.

How Fact.MR helps to take strategic action for the market manufacturer Aptamers?
The data provided in the Aptamers market report offers a comprehensive analysis of significant industry trends. Industry players can use this data to strategize their potential trade movements and generate remarkable revenue over the coming period.
The report covers price trend analysis and value chain analysis as well as the analysis of the diverse supply of market players. The primary motive for this report is to help companies make data-driven decisions and strategize for their trade movements.

Some of the Aptamers Market insights and estimates that make this study unique in approach and effective in guiding stakeholders in understanding growth dynamics. The study provides:
• Details regarding the latest innovations and developments of Aptamers and how it is gaining popularity with customers during the forecast period.
• Analysis of customer demand for products and how it is likely to evolve in the coming years.
• Latest regulations enforced by government agencies and local agencies and their impact on market demand for aptamers.
• Information on the adoption of new technologies and its influence on the size of the Aptamers market.
• Overview of the impact of COVID-19 on the Aptamers market and the economic disruption caused by the pandemic.
• Evaluates the post-pandemic impact on Aptamers market sales during the forecast period.

Need more information on the reporting methodology? Click here:-

After reading the Aptamers report market information, readers may:
• Understand the drivers, constraints, opportunities and trends affecting market sales.
• To analyze the key regions holding a significant share of the total revenue of the Aptamers Market.
• Study the growth prospects of the Aptamers market scenario including production, consumption, history, and forecast.
• Learn the consumption pattern and impact of each end use and analysis of the Aptamers market supply.
• Investigate recent R&D projects carried out by each market player and analyze the competition of Aptamers market players.

Read more of Fact.MR’s trend reports: –

Reasons to choose a Fact.MR:
• Comprehensive market research to provide information from A to Z.
• Digital technologies to provide innovative business solutions to clients.
• Availability of services 24/7.
• Interaction with suppliers, vendors and service providers for a specific market landscape.
• Customized reports according to customer requirements.


US Sales Office:
11140 Rockville Pike
Office 400
Rockville, Maryland 20852
United States
Phone. : +1 (628) 251-1583

The head office:

Unit No .: AU-01-H Gold Tower (AU),
Plot number: JLT-PH1-I3A,
Jumeirah Lakes Tours,
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Visit our website:
Research overview:
Source of content:

About Fact.MR:

Market research and consulting agency with a difference! That’s why 80% of Fortune 1000 companies trust us to make their most critical decisions. While our experienced consultants use the latest technology to extract hard-to-find information, we believe our USP is the trust clients have in our expertise. Covering a wide spectrum – from automotive and industry 4.0 to healthcare and retail, our coverage is extensive, but we make sure that even the most specialized categories are analyzed. Our sales offices in the United States and in Dublin, Ireland. Headquarters based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Contact us with your goals, and we will be a competent research partner.

This version was posted on openPR.

Source link

]]> 0
Pudong in China envisions groundbreaking technological innovation Tue, 03 Aug 2021 08:47:00 +0000

View of Pudong Photo: cnsphoto

When Lu Xiaowei began his career in Zhangjiang, a 17 square kilometer farmland in Shanghai’s Pudong New Area in 1993, there was little more than a deserted reed swamp, with no roads and little traffic.

Her decision, at the time, was a bold one, and she still vividly remembers how she, along with other “pioneers”, started from scratch at the beginning, endured hardships, and meticulously overcame the lack of all. tools needed to start a business.

But what is more innovative in the 1990s is the decision of the top Chinese leaders. In 1990, China announced the development and opening of Pudong in Shanghai, aiming to make the region a symbol of China’s connection to the world and a vanguard of the take-off of China’s socialist market economy. .

Zhangjiang is China’s first high-tech industrial park. Over the past three decades, the region – a glowing demonstration of Pudong’s drastic transformation – has become a landmark of China’s technological innovation. It is now home to more than 200 semiconductor companies with an industrial scale of over 10 million yuan ($ 1.55 million), a “pharmaceutical valley” that produces one-third of Chinese new drugs, and an “island” for it. artificial intelligence (AI) which is valued. more than 27 billion yuan. More than 15% of companies born in Zhangjiang are said to have been listed on the Shanghai STAR market.

“We have a theme song for Zhangjiang Industrial Park. The lyrics say everyone has a dream, and if we cultivate the seeds of the dream, we can see our dreams come true someday,” Lu, now general manager of Zhangjiang Group’s asset operating division, told the Global Times.

30 years later, Zhangjiang and Pudong are on track to make those dreams come true. As companies and innovators now dream bigger, Pudong, in the years to come, will boldly shoulder the heaviest burden, “crack the hardest bone”, striving to become a pioneer of reform and openness to a higher level, and a pioneer zone for socialist modernization, according to a directive issued by China’s central government last month.

One of the tasks Pudong will undertake is to become a “national team” and spearhead major advances in basic technologies, which observers say is of crucial importance as China steps up its efforts. to develop autonomous technologies in the midst of a group led by the United States. technological repression.

Will Pudong be able to take on such a task? The answers can be seen everywhere as you visit Pudong, from skyscrapers lighting up the Shanghai night sky to thousands of low-key tech entrepreneurs making technological breakthroughs in what they call a mind of “keeping your feet on the ground and looking ahead.” the top to the stars ”, and to the local elected officials who draw the master plan for the future development of the region.

“Pudong is called to play a pioneering role in China’s technological map, and our biggest difference from other technology centers is the emphasis on technological innovation capability. We are not product driven. We are building infrastructure, scientific facilities and investing heavily in basic research. , that we aim to improve our ability to innovate – the key to international technology competition, ”Peng Song, an official at Pudong, told the Global Times.

Chip industry

Among the various high-tech industries that Pudong is building, the integrated circuit is one of the focal points.

At the highest level, the central government also places a lot of hope in Pudong to make inroads into the integrated circuit industry.

Under the aforementioned guidelines, officials pointed out that China will speed up the construction of national science centers in the Zhangjiang area of ​​Pudong, with a focus on integrated circuits, life sciences, intelligence technologies. artificial and connected industries.

Pudong’s direction to push its integrated circuit industries to the next level came from the fact that the region already formed a powerful and complete integrated circuit industrial chain over the years.

Home to domestic and foreign integrated circuit giants such as Qualcomm, Cambricon and NVIDIA, Shanghai saw industrial integrated circuit sales reach 207.13 billion yuan in 2020, up 21.4% year-on-year. other. Zhangjiang accounted for more than half of sales, its total sales of integrated circuits reached 128.54 billion yuan last year, up 22.9% year on year.

The foundations have been laid, where is the next step for Pudong?

Zhou Zhengyu, deputy director of the Shanghai Pudong Scientific and Economic Committee, highlighted several missions that Pudong will undertake soon to build an industrial cluster of integrated circuits. According to Zhou, the government will encourage key companies to target the world’s most advanced techniques and technologies, pushing them to catch up with or even surpass them.

Pudong will also promote the manufacturing capacity of mature integrated circuit processes to ensure the stability of supply chains.

“On the government side, we will take steps to improve the business environment and ecosystem to facilitate technological breakthroughs for businesses, but we will leave it to businesses to do the actual research work in partnership with the institutes. research and other platforms, ”he said. the Global Times.

He also pointed out that the government will invest in basic research facilities, such as building a national laboratory in Zhangjiang which will encompass technological research on integrated circuits. The government will also come up with policies that favor integrated circuit talent coming to Pudong to work, such as grants, talent apartments, and preferential taxation.

According to Zhou, Pudong’s integrated circuit industry is on the verge of entering a “golden age”, with the capital support of the Council of Scientific and Technological Innovation, the opportunities generated during the epidemic of coronavirus and the efforts of domestic companies.

“As companies recognize this is a good opportunity to develop the industry, and with the right policies and business environment, I believe good opportunities will be generated through hard work,” said he declared.


In 1994, the Swiss multinational healthcare company Roche Holding established its Chinese headquarters in Pudong, Shanghai, making it the region’s leading foreign pharmaceutical company. Today, the region has over 1,000 companies involved in the upstream and downstream biomedicine and health industries.

Shen Hong, head of Roche’s Shanghai Innovation Center, told the Global Times that central government guidelines will make Pudong more open and attractive to international talent, thereby improving the region’s biotech capacity.

“Pudong will not only serve the domestic market, it will also become an international pharmaceutical valley serving patients around the world,” Shen said.

For local AI companies, internalization is also one of the biggest advantages of Pudong, which allows them to export products to the large global market.

In 2015, Gu Jie, president of Shanghai Fourier Intelligence, quit his job at a foreign company and created the rehabilitation robotics start-up in Zhangjiang.

“Many young people made similar decisions back then, which goes hand in hand with Pudong’s 30-year development footprint: first attracting international companies to form a world-class industrial cluster, then giving birth to local high-tech companies with visions capable of competing with foreign rivals, ”Ge told Global Times

“Pudong’s vibrant atmosphere prompts us to create globally competitive technology, and based on the Yangtze River Delta’s complete manufacturing chain, we are able to quickly translate our research and development into products.” , noted Ge.

Fourier now sells its rehabilitation robots in more than 20 countries and regions, and according to Ge, the company’s sales have surpassed most foreign rehabilitation robotics companies.

“China’s past tendency to focus only on domestic markets has ended, and as the door opens, more Chinese tech companies will gain a foothold in international markets,” Ge added.

Source link

]]> 0
What is the right amount of prototype parts? Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:27:02 +0000

Speed ​​to market is essential. In our hyper-competitive industrial and consumer sectors, new product development is advancing faster than ever with no sign of slowing down. OEMs, suppliers and subcontractors struggle to meet customer demands and actively seek new solutions that improve processes and meet deadlines. Advances in rapid prototyping technology have allowed product developers to quickly and often fail when it comes to testing and validating products. However, many design engineers and manufacturing specialists are now challenged to further optimize the product development lifecycle and need to identify efficient ways to produce the right amount of prototypes to proactively solve problems and get to market first.

New Product Development (NPD) is often a complex process that typically introduces unforeseen challenges that extend lead times. This inevitably leads to production delays, reduces competitive advantage and, of course, erodes profitability. In order to effectively increase your NPD schedule, what steps need to be followed throughout the process? What should your early-stage prototype development look like? How many prototypes are needed for testing and evaluation? When would it make sense to build more than 100 prototypes?


The following article provides quick tips for determining the right amount of prototypes throughout the product development lifecycle and how to advance NPD deadlines.

Early stage product development

The value of having a physical prototype on hand can never be underestimated. What was previously a highly manual process has improved tremendously through 3D printing, machining and other technologies that result in high precision parts representative of the design and purpose of the process. original engineering. During early stage product development, unique prototypes are created to immediately test shape and fit. For example, electronics manufacturers developing new shell designs must insert circuit boards, wires, harnesses, etc. that make the product operational. Several iterations are usually required, and it’s common for engineering changes to lead to completely new designs and revisions.

Depending on the access to prototyping resources (technologies or materials), engineers find themselves either producing parts in-house or subcontracting to subcontractors. It’s difficult to determine how many unique prototypes will be needed for your specific application, but it’s important to make an educated guess as outsourcing prototype parts can get expensive.

Recommendation: Generally, 3D printing is the ideal process for one-off prototypes because of the advantages of speed and precision. In some scenarios, machining is a great option, so it ultimately depends on your early stage product development requirements. Consider how many different iterations you can go through and the type of materials needed to test shape and fit.. The only downside to this process is the ability to test the functionality and performance of the parts.

Functional tests and feedback

Successfully advancing the NPD calendar relies on the ability to make rapid improvements. While the definition of quick is subjective, the process of testing prototypes and collecting technical feedback is not. This involves determining the absolute qualities of the product and ensuring that the mechanical properties meet the required standards and customer expectations. Once the design of a prototype is defined, the next step in the NPD life cycle is functional testing. Note: Poor performance in functionality testing may force redesigns and re-examination of the initial process.

It is not uncommon for an engineering department to need 30 to 50 identical prototypes for testing or feedback purposes. Depending on the intention of the product, this includes measuring impact resistance, ductility, bending, fatigue, UV resistance, etc. In addition, there are several stakeholders involved in the NPD who may or may not be physically located in the same location. Having access to this quantity of prototypes improves technical communications between several departments and eliminates unnecessary delays. Functional testing alone justifies the need for many parts, but the intangible benefits that come with the ability to communicate quickly internally and externally will certainly lead to a faster time to market.

Recommendation: Correct examination during the functional testing and feedback phase requires several identical parts. This type of low volume production demand can be accomplished with 3D printing, machining or molding processes. However, the time required to produce this amount of parts with 3D printing negates the inherent speed advantages, and traditional molding tools can be expensive, especially when a final design is not approved. Determining your break-even point between these technologies will make a difference in your bottom line and keep your product development ahead of schedule. Find out how DeMarini Sports solved this dilemma in a case study posted on the Fortify website.

Product launch

The healthcare market is known to bring products early to high-end users and influencers. A soft launch approach like this occurs frequently for all industries, but the medical device market is certainly unique. Obtaining concrete feedback from those who use the product in its operational environment is particularly beneficial for several reasons:

  • This is the last chance for engineering to make design changes.
  • It allows the marketing team to validate the message, the brand image and the packaging.
  • Early adopters are more likely to become credible testimonials for your product, which will lead to new sales opportunities.
Strengthenfive stages in the development of a medical device

As your business enters the final stages of development and prepares for product launch, engineers may be tasked with producing over 100 prototypes for beta testing. Prototypes, or early products, should look, feel, and perform as intended. At this point, it’s important to make an honest assessment of your 3D printing abilities and recognize that this technology may not be the right solution. Costs, material limitations, or a combination of both can be barriers to producing low volume parts.

Recommendation: For the most part, the design is complete and your product is ready to go. It is rare in the 3D printing industry to find a technology capable of simultaneously printing end-use materials that meet acceptable cosmetic qualities. This limits the use of 3D printing for low volume production. While molding is a much better option for producing parts that meet functional and aesthetic standards, tooling can become very expensive, especially when errors or design changes result in multiple iterations.

Is there an option between?

3D printed molding tools is a production transition method that allows engineering teams to combine the low cost of 3D printing with the productivity of injection molding. When your team needs 30-100 identical prototypes to quickly advance the product development lifecycle, 3DP IM tooling can be the answer. It’s an inexpensive way to quickly redesign and print on-demand tools that are injected with end-use materials and exceed quality expectations.


About the Author:

Ben Arnold leads Fortify’s sales and marketing efforts as vice president of business development. Arnold joined the 3D printing industry in 2006 and has decades of experience helping companies bring new equipment technology to market. He has been at the forefront of several industry innovations, including multi-material polymer printing (Objet Connex); multi-laser metal printers (SLM Solutions); and the evolution of metal printing based on MIM (Desktop Metal). Arnold brings this experience to his role at Fortify working with customers to identify key applications for manufacturing digital composites. He holds BSME (WPI) and MBA (Northeastern) degrees.

Source link

]]> 0
The death knell for the congressional inquiry Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:32:32 +0000

Parliamentary Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy is playing a bad political hand as well as he can: when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected two of his choices for the special committee to investigate the Capitol riot, he announced he would attract everyone and launch his own parallel investigation into the events of January 6.

“We will conduct our own investigation,” McCarthy said. “Why was the Capitol so ill-prepared for that day when they found out December 14 they had a problem? And what did we do to make sure it didn’t happen again?” He added: “House Democrats must answer this question: why are you allowing a lame speaker to destroy this institution?

The strategy is clear: to make the Democrats and Liz Cheney committee look even more like political theater. Turn the whole debate into a single blame on Pelosi for the Capitol’s poor security against Democrats who blame former President Donald Trump’s election demands for inciting the riot in the first place.

Will this help get to the bottom of the Capitol Riot? Probably not. But congressional control, a legitimate constitutional duty, has long since become a partisan exercise. Under the Republicans, there were numerous hearings on former President Bill Clinton and later on Benghazi that did little to move public opinion. Democrats have conducted similar inquiries into Trump’s trade relations and his alleged relations with the Russians as part of the country’s efforts to overturn the 2016 presidential election.

Red meat for the partisans, certainly, but not very convincing for the hesitant. Gone are the days when the Watergate committee blew up a big scandal in an ultimately, but belatedly bipartisan way. Now even Trump-Russia Special Advisor Robert Mueller is not seen as an honest middleman, but rather a figure in the Democrats’ quest for the 45th president.

Cheney’s presence on the Democratic-led committee, along with the general tone of the Jan.6 media coverage, will give him a bit more legitimacy. But not a lot. There are legitimate questions about the organizers of the riot, the gravity of the effort to disrupt the Electoral College certification, the extent of the security readiness on Capitol Hill, and, yes, Trump’s guilt. There is a picture that individual lawsuits against rioters probably cannot paint. Unfortunately, neither does Congress.

Source link

]]> 0
Solid waste management -1 Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:43:45 +0000 A mature and responsible approach to solid waste management begins at the end of the 19th century

Until the end of 320 BC in Athens, solid wastes were thrown unpaved on open fields and accumulated vigorously on paths, plots or land. However, when such things were done on a daily basis, a law banning these throws was eventually passed and became a blessing for all ecology. But we must not forget that Islam had already given us lessons and teaches the concepts regarding environmental protection and solid waste management in the right way.

After that, the system of disposal and waste management began in the then Greek cities and among the Romans the landowners were responsible for cleaning their respective areas or streets while making these things a specialty. But these things weren’t as organized and were somehow random. However, the organized system was only associated with state-sponsored events, nothing more than that. And when performing any kind of disposal, it was collected and then placed in open pits just outside the communities. But over time, the efforts were increased and the elimination was carried out far from the population area.
This very small contribution or work regarding elimination also began to decline when the Empire of Rome disappeared. Until the 14th century, scavengers were responsible for removing waste or putting it in pits, but outside the city and in 1714 the city of England contained official scavengers. And at the end of the 18th century, the American municipal system founded the first garbage center in Bonston, New York and Philadelphia. Within these systems, the wastes were still rudimentary and rudimentary, but the dumping of wastes was just astonishing by putting them in the pits along the banks of the rivers.
Developments in waste management
A mature and responsible approach to solid waste management began in the late 19th century when sealed cans were used to collect solid waste and in many parts of the United States heavy duty vehicles were used to collect and transport solid waste on fixed plots. . However, an important and valuable development was observed in the area of ​​waste management, when the city of England obtained the construction of the first waste incinerator in 1874. And at the beginning of the 20th century, 15% of the major American cities have incineration plants, However, many use earlier equipment, but the weight of disposal is the same.
Over time, technological waste management has also progressed and many other instruments have intervened between the creation and disposal of waste, such as garbage crushers, compaction trucks and pneumatic piping system have been put. in place, as the disposal of waste in open fields creates more pollution, ravages the environment and endangers the health of living things. For this, a new system has been treated, which is more advanced and protects against any inconvenience of the environment, that is to say a sanitary landfill system.
This system replaces incineration and dumping of waste in the open air, which is really a gigantic system to mitigate environmental tampering. However, the use of sanitary landfills protects and preserves the environment from the harmful effects emitted by incinerators and landfills and these landfills are well equipped. Nowadays, incinerators are also manufactured in such a form, which depletes the heat to go outside and has many air pollution control devices to meet the strict air quality. And now in modern times, solid waste management plants are being enhanced with recycling chambers and waste reduction at source.
Characteristics of solid waste
There are different types of solid waste due to their different emission and exemption sources. These wastes can come from residential houses, commercial properties, industries, institutions, etc. However, the main character and the most decisive character that will make a huge difference between them is dangerous behavior and non-dangerous nature. Hazardous waste is collected in the proper paved way and then disposed or recycled in a proper way, a little mishandling can cause huge or serious damage, so you have to be very careful and do these things in a well subordinate and technological way. These hazardous have good sources but not as much as non-hazardous ones, as they are emitted by many common sources, so for common management and at individual level, one can easily manage non-hazardous waste, if follow the procedure in a very ethics.
Non-hazardous waste, once collected, should be separated and divided into wet and dry chambers, wet waste should be broken down into a form of manure, but dry waste should be used for other purposes after recycling.
It can also contain waste and waste but waste is compostable while waste or we can say waste is recycled and then processed for other equipment as it is not hazardous so it can be recycled and then reused for other purposes. Such as waste adds about 20% of MSW in the United States to municipal solid waste. This type of waste is specifically referred to as the construction and demolition (C&D) process and is truly a process in many developed countries.
The generation of solid waste varies from country to country, as the population of the respective area has different behavior and approach to the environment, so there may be differences in the generation of solid waste. waste at each national level. Let’s take an example of different nations, because America has very little waste paper than the nations of Japan, of Europe. Or we can highlight the example of India, it has more plastic waste than others, so people’s behavior and people’s coordination with the environment vary the waste generation. (To be continued)

Email: —–

Source link

]]> 0
Jason Simon explains the difference between traditional banks and FinTechs Mon, 19 Jul 2021 23:23:09 +0000

For years, consumers have tolerated the technological backwardness of traditional banking services. But with the rise of FinTech, they are struggling to keep up and provide customers with the innovation they need. Many people even wonder what the difference is and whether, in any case, the two should join forces to develop the financial services that consumers are looking for. Jason Simon, FinTech and eCommerce expert, explains how they differ from traditional banks.

According to data, from 2018 to 2021, the number of FinTechs almost tripled. In 2018, $ 254 billion was invested globally in around 18,000 FinTech startups via venture capital funds. First of all, it is important to know what? The FinTech industry combines financial services and technology to help individuals and businesses manage payments and financing. There is no doubt that its rise has come to change the way this sector is managed. The word FinTech is a combination of ?? finance ?? and technology. ?? Also called technofinance or techno-financial sector, the term describes an innovative technology that strives to automate and improve the implementation and distribution of financial products and services.

Simon explains that FinTech technology helps business owners, businesses and consumers easily manage their finances and business processes digitally. It is usually accessed through a computer or other devices, such as a smartphone or tablet. The industry began its development in the late 1990s when e-commerce and Internet companies emerged. In the 21st century, this technology has been integrated into the backend systems of financial institutions to digitize banking operations. Since then, FinTech has focused on consumer-oriented services. It is now used in a variety of industries including retail banking, investment management, fundraising and non-profit organizations, education, and personal financial services. Cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin are also part of FinTech development.

On the other hand, a traditional bank is a financial institution authorized to receive deposits and grant loans to individuals and businesses. Some banks also offer other financial services such as wealth management, safes and currency exchange.
There are three types of banks: merchant banks, retail banks, and investment banks. In most countries, they are regulated by a central bank or the national government. According to Simon, during the first months of COVID-19, the use of mobile banking services increased by 20 to 50%, and this trend is expected to continue after the pandemic. After conducting several studies, it was learned that consumers demand more flexible processes when it comes to digital banking. 71% prefer multi-channel interactions and 25% want a 100% digital experience with their bank, with remote human assistance available when needed.

?? To meet customer demand for speed, efficiency and user experience, financial providers need to integrate technology into their services, ?? Simon says. ?? This will allow them to deliver the agile experience that consumers expect. While retail giants like Amazon allow customers to complete a purchase in seconds, opening a new bank account shouldn’t require a face-to-face meeting.

FinTech services bridge the gap between what traditional banks offer and what the modern consumer expects. This sector is experiencing massive growth. In fact, according to The Business Research Company, the global FinTech market was valued at around $ 127.66 billion in 2018 and is expected to reach $ 309.98 billion with an annual growth of nearly 25% by 2022. FinTechs and traditional banks aim to provide comprehensive financial services to consumers. This is really the only similarity. FinTech companies are considered the biggest competitors of banks. The financial system that banks rely on today is made up of very traditional and outdated practices and procedures. It often lacks speed and agility. As consumer demands increase in this regard, they are looking for financial solutions that better meet their needs.

In terms of innovation and progress, traditional banks are lagging behind and FinTech companies are mobilizing. They may control a small part of the global banking system right now, but consumers are increasingly choosing to use them as a substitute for banks. According to Statista, between 2015 and 2019, consumer adoption of FinTech businesses and products grew rapidly around the world. In 2019, 75% of consumers worldwide started using some form of money transfer and / or payment service.

About Jason Simon

Jason Simon is a financial technology and digital payments expert who got involved in cryptocurrencies when they were introduced. He enthusiastically follows what is happening in the changing world of finance, excited about the prospects that digital currencies offer global consumerism. When not involved in advancing the digital payments space, he enjoys spending time with his family and improving his community.

This news content may be incorporated into any legitimate news gathering and publication effort. Linking is allowed.

Press release distribution and press release distribution services provided by WebWire.

Source link

]]> 0
Montana Farm Equipment “Right to Repair” Advocates Welcome Federal Recognition | State and regional Sun, 18 Jul 2021 13:00:00 +0000

The Montana Farmers Union and the Montana Grain Growers Association – both of which have supported right to redress legislation – spent a total of $ 65,855, but the two groups listed dozens of other bills they were dealing with. worked throughout the session. The Repair Association did not disclose any lobbying.

Mixed reactions to Biden’s order

While some right to redress advocates, like Harmon, dismissed the likelihood of real change coming from the federal government, others viewed Biden’s decree as a substantial victory.

“If the FTC tells them that they have to give the farmer and rancher access to the right to repair their own equipment, they can’t get around that,” said Walter Schweitzer, president of the Montana Farmers Union. .

But other advocates, as well as some Republicans in Montana who have expressed support for right to redress initiatives, would prefer to see state-level action. And many expect to see similar legislation resurface in the next legislative session in 2023.

The appeal of the issue across party lines was evident for a while in late February, when Sullivan’s bill was presented to the House Judiciary Committee amid a marathon of hearings prior to the transmission of the bill. During a break, Republican Rep. Jennifer Carlson, from Belgrade, approached the committee chair, Rep. Barry Usher, to let him know that she would vote to pass the measure to the entire House.

Source link

]]> 0